What is estimated
The ratio between waist and hip circumference using measurements in the same unit.
Enter your values, then calculate to see a verified result.
A clear calculation path based on your inputs.
Versioned calculationFormula v1.0.0
The ratio between waist and hip circumference using measurements in the same unit.
Both measurements are normalized before division; the result itself has no unit.
Measurement site and population context matter. The displayed reference threshold is a screening context, not a diagnosis.
82 cm100 cm82 / 100 = 0.820is the dimensionless waist-to-hip ratio.
Compare only with a reference that matches the measurement protocol and population.
Trend checks require the same tape position and conditions each time.
Continue with your result
Keep exploring
Independently divide normalized waist by hip circumference, test unit cancellation, and verify both sex-specific reference boundaries without display-rounding leakage.
These records describe the published model and reference tests. A test-case count is not a certification of every possible input or an independent specialist review. Editorial policy
2026-10-04 - Initial CalculatorGeek shared-system implementation with source-backed method, fixtures, content, and result journey.
Up to 12 examples from the configured definition fixtures are shown. Expected values use the stated output units; invalid inputs are intended to be rejected.
| Case | Inputs | Expected result |
|---|---|---|
| male below reference | Equation sex term: male; Waist circumference: 82 cm; Hip circumference: 100 cm | Waist-to-hip ratio: 0.82; Sex-specific reference threshold: 0.9; classification: below-reference |
| imperial parity | Equation sex term: male; Waist circumference: 32.283465 in; Hip circumference: 39.370079 in | Waist-to-hip ratio: 0.82 (allowed numeric tolerance: 0.0001) |
| female boundary | Equation sex term: female; Waist circumference: 85 cm; Hip circumference: 100 cm | Waist-to-hip ratio: 0.85; classification: at-or-above-reference |
| invalid hip | Equation sex term: female; Waist circumference: 70 cm; Hip circumference: 20 cm | Reject invalid input: hip |
Report an issue with this tool. Include the page URL, units, expected answer, and steps to reproduce. Do not include sensitive personal information.
Divide waist circumference by hip circumference and compare the unrounded ratio with the cited sex-specific screening reference.
The calculator keeps the measurement protocol and limitations visible instead of labeling one ratio as a universal health verdict.
Start with the Health calculators hub when you need to choose a different body-measurement method.
For a complementary body-measurement workflow, use the Lean Body Mass Calculator. Compare a regression-based estimate of non-fat mass.
WHR = waist circumference / hip circumference. Because the units cancel, centimeters and inches produce the same ratio when both measurements use the same unit.
The contextual reference shown is 0.90 for the male coefficient set and 0.85 for the female coefficient set, as summarized in the cited WHO report. WHO also describes important population and protocol limits.
To compare this method with a different input model, open the Body Roundness Index Calculator. Apply the ellipse-based waist-height index.
82 / 100 = 0.820. The same measurements entered as 32.28 in and 39.37 in produce the same ratio.
For the female reference context, 85 cm / 100 cm = 0.850, so the unrounded result is at the cited threshold.
A larger ratio indicates more waist circumference relative to hip circumference. It does not identify the cause or quantify visceral fat directly.
For another relevant cross-check, continue with the Relative Fat Mass Calculator. Estimate body-fat percentage from height and waist.
Use one documented protocol and repeat it consistently. Different protocols can use different landmarks and should not be mixed.
No, provided both circumferences use the same unit.
No. These are contextual screening references, not diagnostic cutoffs for an individual.
Waist, hip, posture, tape position, breathing, and measurement error can change the ratio independently of scale weight.
It answers a related but different question and avoids the additional hip measurement. Use the method appropriate to your source or protocol.
Sources were checked 2026-10-04. They establish the published method or measurement context; they do not turn an anthropometric estimate into a diagnosis, direct body-composition measurement, or treatment recommendation.
From the guide library
Health
Learn what a calorie deficit means, how it differs from energy balance, how to calculate it, and why short-term scale change is not pure…
Health
Understand the 3,500-kcal-per-pound shortcut, the 7,700-kcal-per-kilogram equivalent, and why real weight-loss timelines are dynamic.
Health
See the current sequence after an Army WHtR result of 0.550 or higher: confirmation measurement, ABCP enrollment, flag and medical provisions.
No close match yetTry a shorter term or browse the categories.